New JAMA examine exhibits adjustments in the public notion of vaping vs smoking – VAPES

272 0
New JAMA study shows changes in public perception of vaping vs smoking
– VAPES

In the second season of the Netflix series Dead to Me, mother Jen Harding (played by Christina Applegate) catches her young son Charlie (played by Sam McCarthy) smoking on the outdoor balcony. When she starts to blame him for his outrageous behavior, Sam actually says, “Well, at least I don’t evaporate.”

This is an example of how far the reputation of tobacco-free steam products has dropped in recent months. Although it’s not the president’s fault, the rush of negativity towards vaping products started a few years ago when Dr. Scott Gottlieb was appointed head of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the first time. It was Gottlieb who mistakenly coined the term “Teen Vaping Epidemic”, a kind of collective call that anti-vaping lobbyists and even the mainstream press use to this day.

Leading public health officials from around the world immediately began to deny the FDA allegations. Dr. Raymond Niaura of New York University College of Global Public Health said Gottlieb’s allegations were “annoying and frustrating” while he punished the FDA for never publishing scientific papers to support the allegation.

Related Article: Public Health Expert: FDA Cherry Harvest Data on “Fake Epidemic”

Dr. Brad Rodu, a professor of medicine at the University of Louisville, Kentucky, immediately accused the FDA of “picking” data to manipulate history negatively. In an interview with Regulator Watch’s Brett Stafford in March 2020, according to his research, Rodu said: “There was only a small percentage of adolescent vapers who used the products between twenty and thirty days, which is considered a more serious use. We do not know if these numbers have increased with the 2018 data as the CDC and FDA have only released selected information. ”

Then came the infamous EVALI outbreak last fall. For months, the FDA, in collaboration with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), launched an anti-vaping promotional tour that intentionally and incorrectly blamed nicotine-based vapor products for a mysterious outbreak of lung injury, one of which more than 2,000 people were affected across multiple states. The story would appear in almost all major news agencies if news anchors and commentators unprofessionally spread a false narrative that vaping could be even more dangerous than smoking.

The JAMA report: V.The call of monkeys takes a blow

On June 15, 2020, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published the results of a comprehensive survey of 3,215 current smokers to determine their individual perception of steam products compared to flammable tobacco cigarettes. The JAMA report, entitled Association of the US Outbreak of Vaping Associated Lung Injury with Perceived Damage from E-Cigarettes Compared to Cigarettes, led to some rather grim results.

The group consisted of 1,833 women and 1,382 men with an average age of approximately 43 years. When asked whether electronic cigarettes were safer than smoking, only 39.9 percent answered positively – compared to 43 percent in the months before the EVALI scandal (CDC and FDA would finally recognize that the cause of the respiratory disease was contraband THC -containing cartridges illegally spiked with vitamin E acetate).

Related article: With a whimper that’s not a bang, CDC finally closes the EVALI case related to “vaping”

Later in the report, data shows that approximately 43.8 percent of participants incorrectly believed that vaping and smoking were equally harmful compared to only 39.9 percent at the end of 2019. However, the most alarming number shows that a whopping 17.2 percent of respondents are wrong now I believe that smoking is safer than vaping. The co-authors of the report explicitly blame the FDA and CDC for these declining numbers for miserably handling their EVALLI response.

“However, many smokers in England and the USA believe that e-cigarettes are at least as harmful to health as flammable cigarettes. These misperceptions are likely to prevent smokers who are unable or unwilling to stop smoking to switch to e-cigarettes, which can adversely affect public health. The recent US outbreak of vaping-associated lung injury (EVALI) has been widely reported worldwide. Most cases have been associated with inhalation of vitamin E acetate, an additive found in some tetrahydrocannabinol steamers. However, news reports have often failed to distinguish tetrahydrocannabinol devices from standard nicotine-based e-cigarettes, which can lead to increased confusion about the relative harms of different nicotine products.

“After the outbreak of vaping-related lung injury in the United States, views about e-cigarettes deteriorated among smokers in England. The proportion who perceive the use of e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarette smoking has decreased and the proportion who perceive the use of e-cigarettes as more harmful has increased by over a third. ”

To put it bluntly, the United States’ equivalent FDA is an organization called Public Health England. (PHE). In August 2015, just a few days after the FDA announced new regulations for steam products, PHE released published research that indicates that vapors are 95 percent less harmful than smoking. To this day, England advocates vapes as a smoking cessation product. The FDA still doesn’t.

Related Article: Renowned Epidemiologist Exposes FDA Claims of Adolescent Vaping Epidemic

(Courtesy of Shutterstock)

Leave a Reply